Normally, I have a lot of respect for Bloomberg.com, but their recent article on the US Government’s pledge of 7.7 trillion to ease frozen credit seems a little absurd all things considered.  Their numbers include some of the following expenses:

$3.18 trillion — Already been tapped by banks and other financial institutions

$2.4 trillion — Set aside to buy short-term notes, or commercial paper, that companies use to pay bills

$1.4 trillion — Used by the FDIC to guarantee bank to bank loans

$29 billion — To help with the Bear Stearns takeover by JP Morgan Chase and Co

Trump International Hotel and Tower slated for completion in mid-2009.

It’s becoming more and more obvious that the problems with the American economy are going to continue for the next several years.  If for no other reason then the knee-jerk reaction that banks and financial institutions are taking to limit their exposure to real estate related investments.  There is no greater example of this then the recent lawsuit filed by Donald Trump against lenders looking to reduce their exposure on the Trump International Hotel and Tower – a 92 story hotel and condominium high-rise architected to be the second-tallest building on United States soil.

Unlike most Trump stories – this isn’t really about Trump or his ego or even about some grandiose plan to expand his empire.  This story is about terminology, bank loans, and whether you believe that the “unprecedented financial crisis in the credit markets” is equivilent to a force majeure equal to an act of war or a natural disaster.  If you believe Trump (or anyone looking at the first page of a foreclosure document), you would consider the financial markets some sort of natural disaster, and that would require an extension and additional funding as provided in the original Trump loan package.